CASE 3 ETHICS - Physical Privacy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

CASE 3 ETHICS - Physical Privacy - Essay ExampleUtilitarianism focuses on the consequences of actions, and the consequences of suspending these dickens players are generally good, while Deontology understands that although people have rights to enhance themselves, they should do so within the bounds of law and integrity, to which they have duties of following. Utilitarians assert that an action is good, if it results to a net good for the greatest number of people, and severe penalties for artificially enhancing performance have widespread benefits to numerous stakeholders (Brooks & Dunn, 2010, p.183). First, the penalty respects the hard work of absolute majority of athletes who do not use these enhancers. Using testosterone has been documented to have immediate physical and functioning effects on athletes, such as increased strength, agility, and swiftness (Lumpkin, Stoll, & Beller, 2012, p.154). Their former manager, Brian Cashman, says that he is not surprised that these athle tes used testosterone. He said In Bartolos case, as well as he has done remnant year as well through this year, at his age, after coming back from that surgery, makes you scratch your head (DelVecchio, 2012). As for Cabrera, Cashmans comments were When we traded him to Atlanta we had him as a low-end, everyday regular or an excellent fourth outfielder (DelVecchio, 2012). ... Sports must be about cancel abilities that are improved through regular practice, discipline, and opposite natural efforts. If everyone followed the same practice of using enhancers, people would no longer know if the performance they see is natural or a product of drug enhancement. The honor and reality of sports will be shattered. This means that using testosterone can have negative effects on the perceptions of both athletes and sports. The penalties are just because they ensure that athletes would not succumb to similar practices and that the sports industrys image will not be marred. With such a high pen alty, other athletes will be discouraged of using enhancers. They will know that the harms to their income and career will outweigh the benefits. Third, using these enhancers has side effects (Lumpkin et al., 2012, p.154). They can experience life-threatening problems such as positive psychoses, heart disease, liver and kidney damage, and cancer (Lumpkin et al., 2012, p.155). Other side effects are mood swings and uncontrollable aggression (Lumpkin et al., 2012, p.155). With these negative effects on athletes, it means that Cabrera and colon are harming themselves. If the youth follows their enhancement practices, they will also be in peril. Thus, as role models who can detrimentally affect the sports industry and other athletes, Cabrera and colon deserve a steep punishment. Deontology focuses on duty, not consequences, and Cabrera and Colon have duties to the sports industry, fellow athletes, and audience to follow rules and regulations (Ferrell et al., 2011, p.159). The sports i ndustry has already banned the use of testosterone and other artificial enhancers because they are unethical. Cabrera and Colon are aware of these